Analysis of the Condition and Effectiveness of the Use of the Pacific Mall Pedestrian Overpass (JPO) in Tegal City
Keywords:
Pedestrian Overpass, Effectiveness, Physical Design, Pedestrian SafetyAbstract
Pedestrian overpasses are designed to enhance pedestrian safety by separating movement paths between vehicles and pedestrians. However, designs that fail to meet technical standards often become the primary factor in their low utilization. This study evaluates the compliance of physical design and effectiveness of the pedestrian overpass at Pacific Mall Tegal. A descriptive quantitative method was used to collect primary data through direct observation of the overpass's physical characteristics and pedestrian behavior, as well as secondary data from relevant technical regulations. Results show that out of 10 physical condition assessment parameters, only 4 parameters meet applicable technical standards, with major non-conformities in bridge width (1.3m versus the standard 2m), step height (25.6cm versus the standard 15-21.5cm), and stair inclination angle (34° versus the standard maximum of 20°). The effectiveness of the overpass usage only reached 23.6%, falling into the ineffective category, with the majority of pedestrians (76.4%) choosing to cross directly on the road. Discomfort factors due to the non-compliance of the overpass's physical dimensions with standards and access that is not user-friendly for all pedestrians are believed to be the main causes of the low usage rate. This study recommends redesigning the overpass to meet technical standards, upgrading supporting facilities such as weather protection and adequate lighting, and implementing routine maintenance to improve user comfort and safety.References
[1] S. Marisamynathan and P. Vedagiri, "Modeling pedestrian level of service at signalized intersection crosswalks under mixed traffic conditions," Transportation Research Record, vol. 2672, no. 35, pp. 1-11, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0361198118787094.
[2] X. Zhuang and C. Wu, "The safety margin and perceived safety of pedestrians at unmarked roadway," Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 119-131, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2011.11.001.
[3] W. Agustina, Efektifitas Jembatan Penyeberangan. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 2004.
[4] P. R. Anciaes and P. Jones, "A comprehensive approach for the appraisal of the barrier effect of roads on pedestrians," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 134, pp. 227-250, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.02.003.
[5] Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga, Tata Cara Perencanaan Jembatan Penyeberangan untuk Pejalan Kaki di Perkotaan. No.: 027/T/Bt/1995. Jakarta: Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, 1995.
[6] Kementerian PUPR, Surat Edaran Menteri PUPR No. 02/SE/M/2018 tentang Perencanaan Teknis Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki. Jakarta: Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia, 2018.
[7] H. H. Harahap, "Analisa karakteristik penggunaan jembatan penyeberangan pada daerah perbelanjaan di Jalan Jendral Sudirman Kota Palembang," Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 146-153, 2014.
[8] M. Setyowati, "Evaluasi fungsi jembatan penyeberangan orang (Studi kasus JPO Pasar Karang Ayu Semarang)," Jurnal Teknik Sipil & Perencanaan, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 17-24, 2017, doi: 10.15294/jtsp.v19i1.10492.
[9] M. Dixit, "Measures to improve pedestrian safety in urban areas," International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Traffic System, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2020, doi: 10.30630/ijtets.6.1.142.
[10] W. Tao, S. Wang, and S. Fan, "Accessibility evaluation and barrier-free design of pedestrian overpasses," Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 257-271, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13467581.2020.1742634.
[11] J. Kim, S. Lee, and S. Lee, "An analysis of pedestrian bridge utilization using pedestrian traffic surveys," Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 186-193, 2019, doi: 10.1080/13467581.2019.1599268.
[12] R. Hasan, M. Napiah, and I. Zaman, "Factors affecting the effectiveness of pedestrian bridges utilization," International Journal of Engineering & Technology, vol. 7, no. 3.28, pp. 319-322, 2018, doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.28.17792.
[13] J. Wu, E. Radwan, and H. Abou-Senna, "Pedestrian-vehicle delay and level of service at signalized intersections," Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, vol. 144, no. 6, p. 04018017, 2018, doi: 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000131.
[14] Y. Li, H. Guo, C. Xu, and Y. Wang, "Pedestrian crossing behavior at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks around the primary school," Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 96, pp. 442-450, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.052.
[15] J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2018. Perencanaan Teknis Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki*. Jakarta: Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aldyno Gazza Nugroho, Irfan Maulana, Marcellius Crisferdy N, Dani Fitria Brilianti (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
