Redesain Trotoar bagi Mobilitas dan Kesejahteraan Penyandang Disabilitas di Jalan Kaptensudibyo
Kata Kunci:
Trotoar, Redesain, Jalan Kapten Sudibyo, Disabilitas, Mobilitas, AksesibilitasAbstrak
Studi ini meneliti dampak desain dan pemeliharaan trotoar terhadap kualitas hidup individu dengan tantangan mobilitas. Elemen utama seperti lebar trotoar yang tepat, landaian trotoar, dan pengerasan jalan diidentifikasi sebagai hal yang penting untuk aksesibilitas, sementara hambatan seperti permukaan yang tidak rata dan halangan dicatat sebagai hal yang menghambat pergerakan. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa trotoar yang dapat diakses memungkinkan kemandirian dan partisipasi sosial, sementara infrastruktur yang tidak memadai membatasi mobilitas dan mendorong eksklusi. Rekomendasi diberikan kepada para pembuat kebijakan dan perencana kota untuk mengadopsi prinsip-prinsip desain inklusif yang mempromosikan akses yang adil bagi semua.
Referensi
[1] C. Cabrera-Arnau, R. P. Curiel, and S. R. Bishop, “Uncovering the behaviour of road accidents in urban areas,” R Soc Open Sci, vol. 7, no. 4, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191739.
[2] R. Hokmabadi, F. Mehri, F. Fasih Ramandi, and A. Karimi, “The Role of High-Risk Behaviors, Fatigue, and Drowsiness in the Occurrence of Road Accidents and Near Miss Accidents among Tehran Truck Drivers in 2019,” Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 258–265, Oct. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.52547/johe.10.4.258.
[3] K. V. Raja, M. Ponnusamy, G. T. Selvi, R. Saravanakumar, M. Ashok, and V. Nagaraj, “Assessment and Prioritization of the Critical Factors Triggering Road Accidents in India,” International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 207–211, Apr. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.110210.
[4] V. Wicramasinghe and S. Dissanayake, “Evaluation of pedestrians’ sidewalk behavior in developing countries,” in Transportation Research Procedia, Elsevier B.V., 2017, pp. 4068–4078. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.327.
[5] J. B. Talevska and M. M. Todorova, “CONTRIBUTION TO SIDEWALK PEDESTRIAN LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS.”
[6] R. Trotoar, P. Kaki, M. Terjadinya, I. Moda, and K. Surabaya…, “Redesign of Sidewalk for Pedalists to Support Capital Integration in The City of Surabaya (Case Study: Jalan Raya Lidah Wetan, Kota Surabaya),” /Mitrans, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 2023–170, 2023.
[7] D. Nag, A. K. Goswami, A. Gupta, and J. Sen, “Assessing urban sidewalk networks based on three constructs: a synthesis of pedestrian level of service literature,” Transp Rev, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 204–240, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1703841.
[8] J. Bunevska Talevska and M. Malenkovska Todorova, “Contribution to sidewalk pedestrian level of service analysis,” Transport Problems, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 5–13, 2012.
[9] T. W. Natalia and T. Rohmawati, “The Relationships between the Characteristics of Pedestrian and the Increase of Facilitation of Sidewalk,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, vol. 662, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/662/4/042030.
[10] N. I. Bahari, A. K. Arshad, and Z. Yahya, “Assessing the pedestrians’ perception of the sidewalk facilities based on pedestrian travel purpose,” Proceedings - 2013 IEEE 9th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and its Applications, CSPA 2013, no. 2010, pp. 27–32, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CSPA.2013.6530008.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Laudryna A’aliya Shalma Agustin, Desty Rachmawaty, Dani Fitria Brilianti (Author)
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
