Bus Rapid Transit Operational Safety Risk Evaluation Using ROADC Approach
Keywords:
risk management, transbusway, ROADC, transportation safety, hazard identificationAbstract
The high number of accidents in the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) mass transportation system requires a systematic risk management approach to improve operational safety. This study aims to analyze and identify hazard factors and operational risk levels of the transbusway corridor 6H on the Lebak Bulus-Senen route, which recorded the 26 highest accident cases among 31 corridors. The Risk Opportunity Assessment and Determining Control (ROADC) method was used through a qualitative and semi-qualitative descriptive approach with three main stages: hazard identification, risk assessment, and risk control. The results identified 15 potential hazards distributed across three operational phases: 3 hazards before operation, 10 hazards during operation, and 2 hazards after operation. Before control, 10 potential hazards were categorized as medium to high and 2 were categorized as high. The implementation of control succeeded in reducing the risk to 9 hazards in the low to medium category, 5 in the medium category, and 1 in the low category, with total elimination of high risk. Heavy traffic conditions require the most comprehensive control including administrative, technical, and personal protective equipment aspects. The contribution given is in the form of strategic recommendations for evidence-based risk control to improve the operational safety of mass transportation systems.References
[1] Sugianto and M. Arief Kurniawan, “Tingkat Ketertarikan Masyarakat Terhadap Transportasi Online, Angkutan Pribadi dan Angkutan Umum Berdasarkan Persepsi,” J. Teknol. Transp. dan Logistik, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 51–58, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.52920/jttl.v1i2.11
[2] A. Febrianto, M. C. H. Pamungkas, D. Sidik, M. Y. Pratama, and Sugianto, “Penilaian dan Evaluasi Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan Perusahaan Angkutan Umum (SMK PAU) di PT. XYZ,” J. Abdimas Transjaya, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 93–101, 2024, doi: 10.46447/jat.v2i2.608.
[3] A. D. R. Sisca, “MANAJEMEN BAHAYA DAN RISIKO ANGKUTAN PARIWISATA KABUPATEN BANYUMAS MENGGUNAKAN METODE FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS (FMEA) DAN FAULT TREE ANALYSIS (FTA),” J. Transp., no. 2504, pp. 1–9, 2022.
[4] B. Mardikawati et al., “Mewujudkan Wisata Bedugul yang Aman melalui Edukasi Keselamatan untuk Pengemudi dan Penumpang,” Empower. J. Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 38–47, 2024, doi: 10.55983/empjcs.v3i1.440.
[5] A. R. Cahyanto, “Analisis Manajemen Bahaya Dan Risiko Di Trans Banyumas Koridor 1 Menggunakan Metode Hiradc,” 2022. [Online]. Available: http://eprints.pktj.ac.id/499/1/18020254-SKRIPSI-ABSTRAK.pdf
[6] A. C. Purpratama, F. Hanifan, R. E. Albarokah, and S. Sarjana, “Sistem Pelaporan Kecelakaan Bus Berbasis Indikator Airbag,” Berk. Forum Stud. Transp. antar Perguru. Tinggi, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 489–498, 2024, doi: 10.19184/berkalafstpt.v2i2.986.
[7] I. W. W. Sancaya and I. M. A. M. Putra, “Tanggungjawab Perusahaan Angkutan Terhadap Kerugian yang Ditimbulkan Akibat Kelalaian Pengemudi Selama Kegiatan Penyelenggaraan Pengangkutan,” Kertha Wicaksana Sarana Komun. Dosen dan Mhs., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 47–43, 2021, doi: 10.22225/kw.15.1.2822.47-43.
[8] E. Prayoga, K. Zaenuri, W. E. Pratama, K. T. Khasianto, and E. Pranoto, “PENERAPAN SISTEM MANAJEMEN KESELAMATAN PERUSAHAAN ANGKUTAN UMUM DI PT. DWI RAYA LAKSANA,” J. Abdimas Transjaya, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 57–82, 2024, doi: 10.46447/jat.v2i2.605.
[9] M. I. H. Rizky Febrian, Muhammad Nur, Suherman, Harpito, “Analisa Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Menggunakan Metode Hazard Identification Risk Assessment & Determining Control (HIRADC) dan Job Safety Analysis(JSA) Pada Bagian Maintenance Workshop di PT. XYZ,” J. Tek. Ind. Terintegrasi, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 652–660, 2023, doi: 10.31004/jutin.v6i3.16453.
[10] S. N. Syawal, K. Kusnadi, and S. Sutrisno, “Analisis Potensi Bahaya dengan Metode HIRADC untuk Mencegah Terjadinya Kecelakaan Kerja di Departemen Injection PT. Indonesia Thai summit plastech,” J. Serambi Eng., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 4211–4217, 2023, doi: 10.32672/jse.v8i1.5038.
[11] A. Mawardani and C. K. Herbawani, “Analisa Penerapan Hiradc Di Tempat Kerja Sebagai Upaya Pengendalian Risiko: a Literature Review,” PREPOTIF J. Kesehat. Masy., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 316–322, 2022, doi: 10.31004/prepotif.v6i1.2941.
[12] F. Aryadinatha, M. D. Zalliandi, R. Yuliandri, and R. Y. Anindita, “ANALISISPENILAIANSISTEMMANAJEMENKESELAMATANPERUSAHAANANGKUTANUMUM(StudiKasusPerumDamriCabangLampung),” abdimas transjaya, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 79–88, 2023, doi: 10.46447/jat.v1i2.593.
[13] Muhammad Zulfi Ikhsan, “Identifikasi Bahaya, Risiko Kecelakaan Kerja Dan Usulan Perbaikan Menggunakan Metode Job Safety Analysis (JSA),” J. Teknol. dan Manaj. Ind. Terap., vol. 1, no. I, pp. 42–52, 2022, doi: 10.55826/tmit.v1ii.13.
[14] A. L. DIANSYAH, J. . SISWANTO, and A. . NOVIANTO, “PENGELOLAAN BAHAYA DAN RISIKO DI BENGKEL OPERATOR BRT (BUS RAPID TRANSIT)”, Jurnal Perintis, vol. 1, no. 2(Maret-April), pp. 59–66, Apr. 2025, Accessed: Jun. 14, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.pktj.ac.id/index.php/perintis/article/view/26.
[15] A. . Rifai, F. . Tohom, and J. Siswanto, “Optimasi Pelayanan Pada Bengkel Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)”, Jurnal Perintis, vol. 1, no. 2(Maret-April), pp. 72–78, Apr. 2025, Accessed: Jun. 14, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.pktj.ac.id/index.php/perintis/article/view/27.
[16] P. G. Alfianti, J. Siswanto, and A. Novianto, “Pengukuran Tingkat Kewaspadaan (Situation Awarness) Pada Pengemudi Angkutan Umum Dengan Metode QUASA”, Jurnal Perintis, vol. 1, no. 1(Januari-Februari), pp. 1–8, Mar. 2025, Accessed: Jun. 14, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.pktj.ac.id/index.php/perintis/article/view/24
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Octaviana Apriadi, Joko Siswanto, Arief Novianto (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
